Executive Summary

U.S. equity markets in mid-2025 stand at a precarious crossroads, presenting investors with a profound and challenging dichotomy. On one hand, major indices have demonstrated remarkable resilience, rebounding sharply from a significant correction earlier in the year, driven by a narrow cohort of technology behemoths and sustained corporate profitability. On the other hand, this market strength is starkly contrasted by a deteriorating macroeconomic landscape, characterized by a contraction in economic growth, stubbornly persistent core inflation, and a global environment fraught with unprecedented geopolitical and policy-driven uncertainty.

The market's journey over the past 18 months has been tumultuous. After a powerful, broad-based rally in 2024, 2025 ushered in a period of extreme volatility. A sharp correction in the first quarter saw the S&P 500 fall nearly 20%, only to be followed by a swift, policy-fueled rebound that brought the index back toward its all-time highs. This "whipsaw" action was not driven by improving fundamentals but by shifting sentiment tied to trade policy and Federal Reserve expectations.

Several critical themes define this complex environment. The Federal Reserve, after a series of rate cuts in late 2024, has adopted a "wait and see" approach, caught in a policy dilemma between slowing growth and intractable inflation. The U.S. economy itself flashed warning signs with a negative Gross Domestic Product (GDP) print in the first quarter of 2025, raising the specter of stagflation-a toxic combination of stagnant growth and high inflation. Concurrently, geopolitical risk has evolved from a cyclical concern into a structural market driver. The velocity of risk from trade policy disputes and active military conflicts has forced investors to re-evaluate traditional safe havens and incorporate a permanent risk premium into valuations.

This report provides an in-depth analysis of these countervailing forces. It dissects the performance of the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite; examines the key economic indicators shaping policy and sentiment; quantifies the impact of geopolitical events; and offers a granular look at sector-level divergence. The analysis culminates in a forward-looking outlook and strategic recommendations, arguing that the current environment necessitates a move beyond traditional asset allocation. Investors must now focus on building portfolios that are structurally resilient to simultaneous and contradictory risks, including growth shocks, inflation shocks, and acute policy-driven volatility.

I. U.S. Equity Market Performance: The 2025 Whipsaw

The performance of major U.S. stock indices from the beginning of 2024 through mid-2025 tells a story of two distinct, and often conflicting, narratives. The period began with a powerful continuation of the post-2022 bull market, leading to historically strong returns. However, 2025 introduced a new regime of heightened volatility, characterized by a sharp correction and a sentiment-driven rebound that has left markets on an unstable plateau. This performance reveals a significant disconnect between headline index levels and the underlying health of the broader economy.

A. The S&P 500: From Record Highs to a Volatile Plateau

After registering its second consecutive year of over 20% total returns in 2024—a rare historical occurrence—the S&P 500 entered 2025 with elevated valuations and palpable investor nervousness.¹⁰ The year began with a "bumpy start," as the index first surged to an all-time high above 6,000 in early 2025 before succumbing to a severe pullback. Between mid-February and early April, the market experienced a sharp sell-off, with the S&P 500 dropping more than 9% in just three weeks and ultimately hitting a bottom on April 8, down 19% from its peak.^{2, 5}

This steep correction was followed by an equally dramatic rebound. Fueled by a temporary pause on the implementation of certain U.S. tariffs and a de-escalation of trade tensions with China, the index soared. From its April 8 low, the S&P 500 gained roughly 20% to reclaim the 6,000 level by early June, with May's 6.1% gain marking the best performance for that month since 1990.²³ This rally was not driven by improving economic fundamentals but was, as described by analysts at BlackRock, propelled "largely by sentiment".⁸ This reveals a market that is fundamentally fragile and dependent on policy accommodation. Its valuation is not supported by current economic output, creating a significant risk of a sharp correction if policy expectations are not met.

B. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA): A Barometer of Cyclical Concerns

The performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), which is comprised of 30 well-established industrial and financial companies, has served as a clear barometer for concerns about the health of the U.S. economy. Tracking its path from 37,689.54 at the end of 2023 to its 2025 peak above 44,000 and subsequent volatility, the DJIA's movements have been less tied to the technology-centric narratives driving the Nasdaq and more reflective of the real-world impacts of interest rates, trade policy, and slowing growth on "old economy" firms.^{12, 13} The index's performance underscores the cyclical nature of the market, which has historically moved through long-term bull and bear phases, providing crucial context for the current period of uncertainty.^{14, 15}

C. The Nasdaq Composite: The Epicenter of Volatility and Narrow Leadership

The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite has been the epicenter of market volatility and the clearest example of the market's narrow leadership. The index surged from a close of 15,011.35 at the end of 2023 to new highs approaching 20,000 in 2025, propelled by immense investor excitement surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and increased capital expenditure plans from "hyperscaler" tech companies.^{16, 26}

However, this rally has been exceptionally concentrated. Analysis from Morgan Stanley shows that the so-called "Mag 7" companies generated 53.7% of the S&P 500's entire return in 2024, masking significant weakness in the average stock. The equal-weight S&P 500, which gives the same importance to each company, produced returns roughly half that of the capitalization-weighted index, highlighting this disparity.¹⁸ This concentration of gains in a few mega-cap stocks is not just a sign of their individual strength but a significant systemic risk. It indicates a lack of broad-based confidence in the economy, with investors making a specific bet on Al and the fortress balance sheets of a few tech giants rather than on the U.S. economy as a whole. This makes the entire market highly susceptible to idiosyncratic risks affecting those few companies, turning this concentration into a vulnerability. The Nasdaq's heightened sensitivity to interest rate expectations further compounds this risk, making it particularly vulnerable to shifts in Federal Reserve policy.²⁰

D. Volatility as a Regime, Not an Event

The market's behavior in 2025 suggests that volatility has become a persistent regime rather than a series of isolated events. The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX), often called the market's "fear gauge," rallied more than 10% following the escalation of the Iran-Israel conflict in June, and futures trading suggests the VIX could remain above its historic average of 20 for the remainder of the year.^{6, 22} This sustained level of expected choppiness reflects the market's "whipsaw" environment, which saw a sharp decline followed by a rapid rebound. This dynamic forced many fund managers who had reduced their equity exposure during the downturn to chase the rally, potentially fueling it further and setting the stage for continued instability.⁸

II. The Macroeconomic Gauntlet

While market sentiment has been a primary driver of short-term index movements, the underlying U.S. economy has been navigating a gauntlet of challenges. The Federal Reserve's monetary policy, the trajectory of inflation, slowing economic growth, and a normalizing labor market have created a complex and often contradictory backdrop for investors. The consensus narrative of a "soft landing" is fraying as data increasingly points toward a more challenging stagflationary environment.

A. The Federal Reserve's Policy Pivot: From Hikes to a Hawkish Pause

After executing one of the most aggressive rate-hiking cycles in modern history between March 2022 and July 2023, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) pivoted in late 2024.²⁷ Faced with a weakening labor market and nascent signs of cooling inflation, the Fed cut its benchmark federal funds rate three times: a 50-basis-point reduction in September, followed by 25-basis-point cuts in November and December. This brought the target rate to a range of 4.25%-4.50%.²⁹

However, the easing cycle was short-lived. Throughout the first half of 2025, the Fed held rates steady, adopting a "wait and see" approach at its January, March, and May meetings. This hawkish pause was necessitated by a stall in disinflationary progress and elevated uncertainty surrounding the economic impact of new U.S. trade policies. This has created a significant disconnect between market expectations and Fed projections. While investors initially hoped for several more rate cuts in 2025, the Fed's own "dot plot" of official projections has signaled fewer moves, with some analysts now expecting only one or two cuts by year-end.^{3, 5} As of June, bond futures markets were pricing in a roughly 60% probability of the next cut occurring in September.³

This situation has placed the Federal Reserve in a precarious policy dilemma. The slowing GDP and cooling labor market data argue for rate cuts to support the economy. Conversely, sticky core inflation and the potential for a new inflationary wave from tariffs demand a restrictive monetary stance. This policy paralysis is a primary source of market volatility, as every new data release causes investors to recalibrate the odds of the Fed prioritizing one of its dual mandates-price stability and maximum employment-over the other. The risk of a policy error in this environment is exceptionally high.^{30, 32}

B. Inflation's Last Mile: The Specter of Stagflation

While headline inflation has fallen dramatically from its 2022 peaks, the final leg of the journey back to the Fed's 2% target is proving to be the most difficult. The annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell to 2.9% in 2024, and the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index-the Fed's preferred gauge-declined to a 2.1% year-over-year rate by April 2025.^{9, 34}

Despite this progress, underlying inflation has remained stubbornly high. Core PCE, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, stood at 2.5% in April 2025, while the Median CPI remained at a sticky 3.5% in May.^{34, 35} Analysts refer to this as "bumpy data" that complicates the Fed's path forward. The primary upside risk to this fragile stability is the new U.S. tariff policy. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) projects that higher import costs from tariffs could contribute to a stagflationary environment, pushing inflation toward 4% by year-end while simultaneously slowing economic growth.³¹

C. Growth Under a Microscope: The Q1 2025 Contraction

The most significant challenge to the "soft landing" narrative came from the Q1 2025 GDP report. After several quarters of consistently positive post-pandemic growth, including a 2.4% annualized increase in Q4 2024, the U.S. economy contracted.⁴ The second estimate for Q1 2025 showed real GDP decreasing at an annual rate of 0.2%, the first negative quarter since 2022.³⁷

A breakdown of the components reveals underlying weakness. The contraction was primarily driven by a steep 4.6% drop in federal government spending and a surge in imports, which are subtracted from the GDP calculation. More concerningly, consumer spending growth-the main engine of the U.S. economy-slowed to just 1.2%, its weakest pace since the second quarter of 2023.³⁸ This combination of negative growth and persistent inflation is the classic definition of stagflation, an outcome that would render current equity valuations, which are predicated on a return to stable growth and lower rates, unsustainable.

D. The Labor Market's Balancing Act: Slowing, But Not Broken

The U.S. labor market has been a source of resilience, but it too is showing signs of cooling. Monthly nonfarm payroll growth has moderated in 2025, with the May report showing a gain of 139,000 jobs, a figure tempered by downward revisions to the prior two months.³³ The unemployment rate has remained remarkably steady, holding within a tight band of 4.0% to 4.2% for over a year.³⁹

However, beneath the surface, there are points of concern. The labor force participation rate slipped to 62.4% in May, and the employment-to-population ratio also declined. This suggests a potential weakening in labor supply, which could keep wage pressures elevated even as hiring slows, further complicating the inflation picture for the Fed.

III. The Geopolitical Variable: A New Structural Risk

The year 2025 marks a definitive shift in the market's risk calculus. Investor focus has pivoted from being primarily driven by central bank policy in 2024 to an environment dominated by high geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty. This is not a cyclical fluctuation but a structural change; geopolitical risk is no longer treated as a series of isolated "black swan" events but as a persistent feature of the investment landscape, forcing corporations to restructure supply chains and investors to demand a higher, permanent risk premium.^{6, 7}

A. The New Paradigm: Geopolitics as a Primary Market Driver

Frameworks designed to measure this risk, such as the Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR), show a sharp escalation in recent years, driven by events like the Russia-Ukraine war and conflicts in the Middle East. This has fundamentally altered investor behavior. As analysts at the Observer note, investors are abandoning the simple binary of "risky bets" and "safe havens," instead evaluating each flare-up for its potential to trigger wider systemic risk.⁴¹ This implies that geopolitical risk is no longer just a driver of short-term volatility but is being incorporated into the fundamental valuation of assets. This "compensation" that investors demand for holding assets in a riskier world translates into a higher discount rate applied to future earnings, acting as a persistent drag on equity valuations compared to previous decades.⁴⁰

B. Trade Wars and "Tariff Tuesday": Policy as a Source of Volatility

In the current environment, the unpredictable nature of U.S. trade policy has become a primary source of market volatility, rivaling the influence of the Federal Reserve. Key events in 2025, such as the abrupt announcement of a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum on June 4, have "blindsided markets" and triggered immediate, sharp sell-offs. The market's sharpest moves in 2025 have been directly tied to these policy announcements and subsequent, equally unpredictable, pauses or de-escalations.⁴²

This dynamic has created a new paradigm where the actions of the executive branch function as a powerful, yet far less predictable, market-moving force than the central bank. While the Fed's actions are, in theory, data-dependent and transparent, trade policy changes have been erratic, maximizing their shock value. This has forced corporations into a state of paralysis, with many pausing large investment decisions due to the inability to model this new form of risk.⁴³

C. Conflict, Contagion, and Safe Havens

The market in 2025 is contending with multiple active and potential conflicts, including the ongoing war in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas conflict and its escalation with Iran, and rising tensions between India and Pakistan.^{44, 45} These are not merely regional issues; they create economic contagion through global trade and financial linkages. Research from the International Monetary Fund shows that stock valuations decline by an average of 2.5% when a major trading partner is involved in a military conflict.⁴⁶

These conflicts also pose a direct threat of commodity price shocks. Renewed instability in the Middle East could disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, potentially pushing oil prices to the $90-$100 per barrel range and reigniting global inflation. In response, investors have scrambled for safety. Gold has been a primary beneficiary, though flows have been volatile. Notably, the U.S. dollar's traditional role as the ultimate safe haven has been questioned, with the Dollar Index Spot dropping nearly 9% year-to-date in 2025, reflecting broader concerns about U.S. policy and debt.⁴⁷

D. The Investor Psyche: A Climate of Fear and Uncertainty

The convergence of these risks has profoundly impacted investor sentiment. Surveys of both institutional and individual investors conducted in early 2025 reveal a climate of fear. The top concerns cited are the threat of a trade war and tariffs (56%), geopolitical tensions (51%), and persistent inflation (43%). A significant portion of investors also harbor fears of a market crash (41%) or a broader economic collapse (43%).¹⁷

This anxiety has led to sharply diminished return expectations. A Commonfund survey found that 62% of institutional investors believe 2025 market returns will be lower than the historical average, a dramatic increase in pessimism from 2024.⁴⁸ A Natixis survey showed long-term return expectations have fallen by 17% from the prior year.⁴⁹ Yet, this fear is contradicted by a palpable "fear of missing out" (FOMO), where investors feel compelled to chase rallies driven by positive policy news to avoid underperformance. This behavioral conflict fuels the market's "whipsaw" dynamic, exacerbating volatility as investors sell on fear and are forced to buy back on sentiment shifts.⁵⁰

IV. Sector Deep Dive: A Tale of Two Markets

The macroeconomic and geopolitical crosscurrents of 2025 have not impacted all areas of the U.S. stock market equally. A granular analysis of S&P 500 sector performance reveals a highly divergent landscape, effectively creating two distinct markets. This divergence provides a clear map of how investors are positioning for an environment characterized by higher interest rates, stubborn inflation, and economic uncertainty. The pattern of leadership and laggardship is a classic market reaction to a stagflationary environment, suggesting that capital rotation is already pricing in this challenging outcome ahead of any official economic consensus.

A. Winners and Losers in 2025

The performance data for 2025 paints a stark picture of sector rotation. On one side, defensive and less economically sensitive sectors have demonstrated resilience. As of early June 2025, Communication Services (+7.3% trailing 6 months), Consumer Staples (+3.1%), and Utilities (+0.4%) posted positive returns. Other sources highlight Conglomerates (+11.32% YTD) and Utilities (+8.03% YTD) as top performers, reinforcing the defensive tilt.^{51, 52}

On the other side, cyclical and interest-rate-sensitive sectors have borne the brunt of the market's headwinds. The Energy sector has been hit particularly hard, down 13.0% in the trailing six months, alongside Health Care (-9.1%), Materials (-7.5%), and Real Estate (-5.5%). Year-to-date data from another source shows an even more dramatic decline for Consumer Discretionary, down a staggering 42.96%.^{51, 52}

B. The Impact of a Hawkish Fed and Higher Rates

The Federal Reserve's "higher for longer" interest rate stance has been a primary driver of this sector divergence.⁵³

• Financials: This sector has been a mixed bag. While banks and insurance companies can benefit from higher interest rates, which widen lending margins, this advantage is threatened by the risk of an economic slowdown, which would curtail loan demand and increase defaults.
• Real Estate & Utilities: These sectors are acutely sensitive to interest rates. They are typically highly leveraged, meaning higher rates increase their borrowing costs. Furthermore, their consistent dividend payments cause them to be treated as "bond proxies" by investors; as yields on safer government bonds rise, the relative appeal of utility and REIT dividends diminishes, putting downward pressure on their stock prices.
• Growth Stocks (Technology): The Information Technology sector's performance has been a battleground. The sector's flat overall performance masks a powerful internal conflict between two opposing forces. The bullish narrative of an Al-driven investment supercycle has propelled a few mega-cap names to new highs. Simultaneously, the bearish pressure of higher interest rates systematically devalues the future earnings on which most technology stock valuations are built. This makes a simple "buy the sector" approach deeply flawed; investors must distinguish between the few profitable giants and the broader universe of long-duration tech stocks that remain highly vulnerable to rate sensitivity.

C. Sector Performance in an Inflationary, Stagflationary Environment

Sectors have also performed according to their ability to withstand a stagflationary environment of slowing growth and rising costs.^{54, 55}

• Inflation Hedges: Sectors with pricing power and ties to tangible assets have historically provided a buffer against inflation. The Energy sector, whose revenues are directly linked to commodity prices, has historically beaten inflation 74% of the time. Similarly, Equity REITs can pass on inflation through increased rents and have outperformed inflation 66% of the time.^{19, 56}
• Inflation-Vulnerable Sectors: Consumer Discretionary stocks are highly vulnerable as inflation erodes purchasing power for non-essential goods. Consumer Staples, while seeing stable demand, can suffer from margin compression if they cannot pass on higher input costs.

V. 2025 Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

Synthesizing the analysis of market performance, macroeconomic data, and the geopolitical landscape, the outlook for the remainder of 2025 and beyond is defined by heightened uncertainty and a wider-than-usual range of potential outcomes. The prevailing market structure, characterized by extreme concentration and high sensitivity to non-economic factors, demands a fundamental rethinking of traditional portfolio strategy. Passive, market-cap-weighted approaches now carry unacknowledged concentration risk, making active, strategic allocation essential for navigating the path forward.

A. Scenario Analysis for H2 2025 and Beyond

• Base Case: The "Muddle Through" Scenario (High Probability). In this scenario, the U.S. economy avoids a deep recession but growth remains sluggish, hovering between 0% and 1.5%. Inflation proves sticky, remaining in a 2.5%-3.5% range, which allows the Federal Reserve to deliver only one or two small rate cuts by year-end. Geopolitical tensions continue to simmer but do not escalate into a new, major global conflict. In this environment, equity markets would likely remain range-bound, characterized by high volatility and continued divergence between sectors, with leadership remaining narrow.
• Bear Case: The "Stagflationary Shock" Scenario (Moderate Probability). This downside scenario could be triggered by a new geopolitical shock, such as a major escalation in the Middle East that causes a spike in oil prices, or the full implementation of threatened tariffs. Such an event would push inflation toward 4%, forcing the Fed to abandon rate cuts and potentially hold rates firm or even hike them, tipping the already weak economy into a full-blown recession. The market impact would be a significant correction, potentially in the range of 15%-25%, as equity valuations built on the hope of lower rates are aggressively repriced.
• Bull Case: The "Immaculate Disinflation" Scenario (Low Probability). This optimistic outcome would require inflation to fall much faster than currently anticipated, giving the Fed a clear runway to cut interest rates more aggressively. This would likely need to be coupled with a significant de-escalation of geopolitical and trade tensions, such as a major trade deal that removes policy uncertainty. The result would be a broad-based market rally, with leadership expanding from the narrow tech cohort to more cyclical sectors of the economy.

B. Strategic Portfolio Positioning for a New Paradigm

The primary challenge for investors in 2025 is that the two most probable risks-a growth shock and an inflation shock-require opposing portfolio strategies. A successful approach must therefore be structured to withstand both contradictory risks simultaneously. This necessitates moving beyond a simple 60/40 stock/bond allocation and building a more resilient, all-weather portfolio.⁵⁷

• Hedge Growth Shocks with Quality Bonds: To protect against a sharper-than-expected economic slowdown, portfolios should include an allocation to intermediate-term government bonds, which would appreciate in value as yields fall in a recessionary environment.
• Hedge Inflation Shocks with Real Assets: To protect against a stagflationary shock, portfolios should maintain strategic allocations to assets that perform well during inflationary periods. This includes commodity-linked equities (e.g., the Energy sector), Equity REITs, and gold, which can serve as a hedge against both inflation and geopolitical turmoil.
• Maintain an Overweight to U.S. Equities, but with a Quality and Defensive Tilt: While the U.S. market faces headwinds, it remains better positioned than many international counterparts. Within equities, the focus should be on quality-companies with strong balance sheets, durable pricing power, and stable cash flows. A nuanced approach is required, favoring sectors like Financials and Health Care for their potential resilience while being cautious of those most vulnerable to consumer weakness and cost pressures.

C. Tactical Recommendations for Navigating Volatility

• Embrace Volatility as an Opportunity: High volatility should not be a cause for panic but an opportunity for disciplined rebalancing. Using market swings to trim over-extended positions and add to undervalued ones allows investors to adhere to strategic targets and benefit from a "buy low, sell high" approach.
• Focus on Active Management and Selectivity: The current environment, with its high dispersion and extreme concentration in passive indices, elevates the importance of active management. A passive, cap-weighted S&P 500 investment is no longer a broadly diversified bet on the U.S. economy but a concentrated bet on a few technology firms. Achieving true diversification may require more active strategies, such as equal-weight ETFs, factor-based investing, or tactical sector rotation, to mitigate this risk.
• Resist the Urge to Time the Market: The most consistent message from market analysis is to avoid making rash decisions based on short-term geopolitical headlines. Historical data shows that exiting risk assets often locks in temporary losses and causes investors to miss the subsequent, often rapid, recovery. Maintaining a long-term focus is paramount.⁵⁸

About the Authors

Md Mohibullah

Chief Strategist & Editorial Director

As Chief Strategist at Fundure Research, Mohibullah architects the conceptual framework for our market analysis. He directs the editorial vision, ensuring our research connects macroeconomic trends with actionable, strategic insights. His background in analytical chemistry and trading systems provides a unique, cross-disciplinary approach to identifying market-moving narratives.

Leo Naim

Lead Data Analyst & Co-Author

Leo is the lead data analyst and AI co-author for this report. He is responsible for processing and synthesizing the vast datasets underlying the analysis, generating the initial drafts, and creating the data visualizations. His role is to translate complex quantitative information into clear, accessible, and insightful chart-based narratives that form the foundation of our reports.

Works Cited

1. Will the Stock Market Keep Soaring in 2025? Wall Street Analysts Are Changing Their Forecasts. The Motley Fool.
2. Weekly Stock Market Update. Edward Jones.
3. June FOMC Meeting Preview: How Long Will the Fed Keep Waiting on Rate Cuts?. Morningstar.
4. Gross Domestic Product. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
5. 2025 Mid-Year Outlook: U.S. Stocks and Economy. Charles Schwab.
6. High volatility in a new geopolitical environment. CaixaBank Research.
7. Understanding Geopolitical Risk in Investments. MSCI.
8. Equity Market Outlook. BlackRock.
9. Analysis: Assessing Inflation's Impact. U.S. Bank.
10. The S&P 500 Is on Track to Do Something for Only the 4th Time in 100 Years. What Does This Mean for Investors in 2025?. The Motley Fool.
11. S&P 500 Monthly Analysis. YCharts.
12. Dow Jones - 100 Year Historical Chart. MacroTrends.
13. Dow Jones Industrial Average Historical Data. Investing.com India.
14. Dow Jones Industrial Average Historical Trends. Raymond James.
15. Dow Jones Industrial Average Historical Trends. Guggenheim Investments.
16. Nasdaq Composite. Wikipedia.
17. 2025 Global Investor Survey: Navigating Private Markets. Adams Street Partners.
18. 2025 Equity and Volatility Outlook. Morgan Stanley.
19. Which Equity Sectors Can Combat Higher Inflation?. Hartford Funds.
20. How Do Interest Rates Affect the Stock Market?. Investopedia.
21. Schwab's Market Open Update. Charles Schwab.
22. CBOE Volatility Index: VIX (VIXCLS). FRED, St. Louis Fed.
23. Moving Averages of the Ivy Portfolio and S&P 500: May 2025. Advisor Perspectives.
24. S&P 500 Historical Data. Investing.com India.
25. S&P 500 (SP500). FRED, St. Louis Fed.
26. NASDAQ Composite Historical Data. Investing.com India.
27. Federal Funds Rate History 1990 to 2024. Forbes Advisor.
28. View of The Impact of the Fed's Interest Rate Hike on the Financial Industry. drpress.org.
29. When is the next Fed interest rate decision?. Equals Money.
30. How The Fed Impacts Stocks, Crypto And Other Investments. Bankrate.
31. Why Inflation Still Poses a Risk to Stocks and Bonds in 2025. Morningstar.
32. How Do Changing Interest Rates Affect the Stock Market?. U.S. Bank.
33. May Employment Numbers Show Gradually Moderating Job Market. J.P. Morgan.
34. Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
35. Median PCE Inflation. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
36. Inflation Nowcasting. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
37. United States GDP Growth Rate. Trading Economics.
38. Charted: America's GDP Decline in Q1 2025. Visual Capitalist.
39. United States Unemployment Rate. Trading Economics.
40. How Firms' Perceptions of Geopolitical Risk Affect Investment. Boston Fed.
41. How Global Conflicts and Volatility Are Reshaping Investment. Observer.
42. Trump's trade war timeline 2.0: An up-to-date guide. PIIE.
43. Geopolitical risk in 2025: From fragmentation to financial fallout. Informa Connect.
44. The 2025 geopolitical calendar. The Strategist.
45. Top Geopolitical Risks of 2025. S&P Global.
46. How Rising Geopolitical Risks Weigh on Asset Prices. IMF Blogs.
47. How can investors deal with geopolitical risks?. UBS United States.
48. Institutional Investors Split on U.S. Economic Outlook. Commonfund.
49. 2025 Individual Investor Survey: Welcome to the age of diminished expectations. Natixis Investment Managers.
50. How investors should think about geopolitical risk. J.P. Morgan Private Bank.
51. Monthly Stock Sector Outlook (2025). Charles Schwab.
52. 2025 Year to Date Best and Worst Performing Sectors, Industries and Stocks. CSIMarket.
53. How Interest Rates Affect the U.S. Markets. Investopedia.
54. Inflation's Impact on Stock Returns. Investopedia.
55. How Inflation Affects The Stock Market. Bankrate.
56. 5 Equity Sectors to Know for Inflation Shocks and Bear Markets. AXS Investments.
57. 2025 Market and Economic Outlook. Edward Jones.
58. How Do Geopolitical Events Impact The Stock Market?. Bankrate.