Gold Market Analysis: Navigating the Crossroads of Economic Deceleration and Geopolitical Risk
By Md Mohibullah & Leo Naim
Executive Summary
The period from late May to mid-June 2025 has been a crucible for the global financial markets, defined by a complex interplay of slowing U.S. economic growth, diverging central bank policies, and a sharp escalation in geopolitical risk. Against this backdrop, gold has asserted its traditional role as a premier safe-haven asset, rallying decisively from approximately $3,300/oz to over $3,400/oz. This performance has validated a broadly bullish stance, yet the underlying market dynamics have proven to be more nuanced and multifaceted than a simple flight-to-safety narrative would suggest.
The U.S. economy has shown definitive signs of deceleration, with a technical contraction in Q1 2025 GDP and a cooling labor market. However, this slowdown is heavily distorted by policy-driven factors, namely the front-running of anticipated import tariffs, which mask resilient underlying domestic demand. This has placed the Federal Reserve in a state of policy paralysis, forced to weigh currently benign inflation data against the significant, yet delayed, inflationary threat posed by these same tariffs. The Fed is widely expected to maintain its policy rate at its upcoming June meeting, a stark contrast to the European Central Bank, which proactively cut rates on June 5, widening the transatlantic policy divergence.
Investor behavior in the gold market reveals a critical bifurcation. Tactical investors, primarily in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) space, engaged in profit-taking in May, leading to the first monthly net outflow in half a year. However, this selling pressure was more than absorbed by a powerful and price-inelastic strategic bid. This "sticky money" is dominated by global central banks, which continue to pursue a long-term strategy of de-dollarization and reserve diversification, a trend underscored by the People's Bank of China extending its gold purchasing streak for a seventh consecutive month.37, 38, 39
The market was further catalyzed by a sudden geopolitical shock—an Israeli strike on Iran—which triggered a classic safe-haven rally in both gold and the U.S. dollar, demonstrating a breakdown of their typical inverse correlation in moments of acute fear.28, 29 The outlook for gold remains constructive, predicated on persistent policy uncertainty stemming from U.S. trade actions, a broadly dovish tilt from global central banks outside the U.S., and gold's re-emerging role as an indispensable hedge against both stagflationary risks and geopolitical instability.
Section 1: The Global Macroeconomic Environment: A Mid-Quarter Inflection Point
The global macroeconomic landscape has reached a significant inflection point in the second quarter of 2025. Data released since late May has confirmed a palpable slowdown in the U.S. economy, while the forward-looking inflation picture is clouded by profound policy uncertainty. This environment sets the stage for critical central bank decisions and has been a primary driver of asset allocation shifts toward safe havens.
1.1 The United States Economy: Confirming a Slowdown Beneath a Distorted Surface
Recent data from the U.S. points unequivocally to a loss of economic momentum, though the headline figures require careful deconstruction to understand the true state of domestic activity.
The most prominent signal of this shift was the first contraction in U.S. economic output in three years. The second estimate for Q1 2025 real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) showed a decrease at an annual rate of 0.2%, a slight upward revision from the advance estimate of -0.3% but a sharp reversal from the 2.4% growth recorded in Q4 2024.1 This places U.S. economic growth on a historically slower trajectory, well below both its 10-year moving average and its long-term series average.3
However, the headline contraction is profoundly misleading. A detailed analysis of the GDP components reveals that the negative figure was almost entirely attributable to a massive surge in imports, which are a subtraction in the GDP calculation. Imports exerted a drag of 5.03 percentage points on growth.4 This surge was not a sign of organic economic weakness but a direct consequence of businesses and consumers rushing to stockpile goods in anticipation of announced U.S. tariff hikes.4 Stripping away this policy-driven distortion reveals a healthier domestic picture. Real final sales to private domestic purchasers—a purer measure of domestic demand that combines consumer spending and private fixed investment—increased by a robust 3.0% in the first quarter.2 This indicates that the core U.S. economy was not in contraction, but that U.S. trade policy is creating significant and unpredictable distortions in top-line economic data. This complicates the Federal Reserve's task of interpreting economic conditions, thereby increasing overall market uncertainty—a fundamentally supportive condition for gold.
This picture of a slowing, but not collapsing, economy is corroborated by the latest labor market data. The May 2025 Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report showed the creation of 139,000 jobs, which was slightly ahead of the 130,000 consensus forecast but represented a continued cooling from the downwardly revised 147,000 jobs added in April.6 Critically, substantial downward revisions for March and April subtracted a combined 95,000 jobs from previous reports, confirming a clear loss of momentum over the spring.6 While the unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%, the composition of job growth revealed a defensive tilt.7 Gains were concentrated in sectors like health care (+62,000) and leisure and hospitality (+48,000), while federal government employment continued to contract (-22,000) as a result of administration spending cuts.6 This lack of broad-based hiring across sectors is a further sign of a maturing and slowing economic cycle.10
Indicator | Period | Actual | Consensus/Previous | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Real GDP (Annualized) | Q1 2025 (2nd Est.) | -0.2% | -0.3% (Adv. Est.) | 1, 3 |
Real Final Sales to Private Domestic Purchasers | Q1 2025 | +3.0% | +2.9% (Q4 2024) | 2 |
Non-Farm Payrolls | May 2025 | +139,000 | +130,000 (Consensus) | 9 |
NFP Revisions (Mar + Apr) | May 2025 Report | -95,000 | N/A | 6 |
Unemployment Rate | May 2025 | 4.2% | 4.2% (Previous) | 7 |
Average Hourly Earnings (YoY) | May 2025 | +3.9% | N/A | 6 |
Consumer Price Index (YoY) | May 2025 | +2.4% | 2.3% (Previous) | 11 |
Core CPI (YoY) | May 2025 | +2.8% | 2.8% (Previous) | 11 |
1.2 Inflationary Crosscurrents: The Fed's Tightrope Walk Between Data and Tariffs
The U.S. inflation landscape presents a significant paradox for policymakers and investors. While the most recent data was benign, a strong consensus of analysis points to a delayed, policy-induced inflationary shock on the horizon.
The May 2025 Consumer Price Index (CPI) report was cooler than investors had anticipated, providing short-term relief. Headline CPI increased by only 0.1% month-over-month, bringing the year-over-year rate to 2.4%.11 The core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, also rose by a muted 0.1% month-over-month, holding its annual rate steady at 2.8%, a level not seen since March 2021.10 This moderation was largely driven by a 1.0% monthly decline in energy prices and falling prices for used cars (-0.5%), new vehicles (-0.3%), and airline fares (-2.7%).13
Despite this soft print, there is a pervasive view that the inflationary impact of tariffs is being postponed, not prevented.10 The current data is seen as reflecting a lag of one to two months, compounded by businesses initially absorbing higher import costs and drawing down on inventories that were front-loaded before the tariffs took full effect.10 A granular look at the CPI report reveals that this "self-imposed inflationary impulse is just beginning," with early warning signs visible in rising prices for categories like household furnishings (+0.3%) and recreational goods (+0.4%).10 This has led to forecasts of a "muggy summer of price increases," with some analysts, including former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, projecting that tariffs could push the year-end inflation rate to 3.0% or higher.10
This creates a significant and potentially mispriced disconnect. The Federal Reserve, operating under a data-dependent framework, sees a benign inflation picture that reduces the immediate pressure for hawkish policy. However, this may be a temporary illusion. This dynamic raises the risk of a policy error, where the Fed could maintain a dovish stance or even cut rates in response to slowing growth, only to be caught behind the curve if tariff-induced inflation surges later in the year. The potential for such a misstep in a developing stagflationary environment—characterized by slowing growth and rising inflation—is an extremely potent long-term catalyst for gold.
1.3 The Eurozone Economy: Growth Outlook Amidst Monetary Easing
In contrast to the policy-induced uncertainty in the U.S., the Eurozone's economic picture appears more straightforward, albeit subdued. In its June 5th monetary policy statement, the European Central Bank (ECB) projected modest real GDP growth for the Euro area, forecasting an average of 0.9% in 2025, 1.1% in 2026, and 1.3% in 2027.16 The rationale for the ECB's decision to ease monetary policy was underpinned by its updated assessment that inflation is converging toward its 2% medium-term target. The ECB's staff projections see headline inflation averaging 2.0% in 2025 before falling to 1.6% in 2026.16 This reflects a downward revision from March, attributed mainly to lower energy price assumptions and a stronger euro.16
Section 2: A Tale of Two Central Banks: Policy Divergence and its Consequences
The first half of June 2025 has crystallized a significant divergence in the monetary policy paths of the world's two most influential central banks. While the European Central Bank has initiated an easing cycle, the U.S. Federal Reserve remains constrained by domestic policy uncertainty. This widening gap is a critical driver for global currency markets and, by extension, the price of gold.
2.1 The Federal Reserve's Calculated Pause: Interpreting the Upcoming June FOMC
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is overwhelmingly expected to maintain the federal funds rate at its current target range of 4.25%-4.50% at the conclusion of its June 17-18 meeting. Market pricing reflects a near-certainty of this outcome.15 This anticipated inaction, however, should not be misinterpreted as satisfaction with the economic outlook. Instead, it represents a state of policy paralysis induced by the profound uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariff policy.19
The tariff regime presents a "dual threat" to the Fed's dual mandate: the tariffs are simultaneously a force for slowing economic growth (an argument for rate cuts) and for boosting inflation (an argument for holding firm or even hiking rates).19 This has effectively suspended the Fed's standard reaction function. The central bank is no longer just data-dependent; it has become uncertainty-dependent. It cannot act pre-emptively against clear signs of slowing growth because it is constrained by the risk of a future inflationary impulse that it did not create. This state of policy gridlock and the associated risk of a policy error increases systemic uncertainty, an environment in which gold thrives as a hedge against policy missteps.
With the rate decision itself a foregone conclusion, market participants will focus intently on the updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), or "dot plot." The consensus expectation is for a hawkish revision, with the median projection likely signaling fewer rate cuts in 2025 than the two that were projected in March. Some forecasts suggest the committee may signal only one cut for the remainder of the year.15 This decision-making process is further complicated by persistent public pressure from President Trump, who has repeatedly demanded rate cuts to stimulate the economy.19 The Fed's ability to navigate these pressures while adhering to its mandate will be a key signal of its institutional independence.
2.2 The European Central Bank's Proactive Cut: Implications for Global Liquidity and Exchange Rates
In a decisive move that contrasted sharply with the Fed's cautious stance, the ECB's Governing Council cut its three key interest rates by 25 basis points on June 5. This action lowered the main refinancing operations rate to 2.15% and, more critically, the deposit facility rate to 2.00%.16
The ECB justified this proactive step with its updated assessment that the inflation outlook is improving, with price pressures seen sustainably returning to the 2% target, aided by moderating wage growth and a stronger euro.16 However, ECB President Christine Lagarde was careful to manage market expectations, emphasizing a "data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting approach" and explicitly stating that the ECB is "not pre-committing to a particular rate path".16 This was a clear signal that the June decision does not automatically herald the start of a rapid or prolonged easing cycle.
The primary consequence of these opposing policy stances is a widening of the interest rate differential between the United States and the Eurozone. Under normal market conditions, this would be a powerful catalyst for U.S. dollar strength against the euro, which would typically act as a headwind for the dollar-denominated gold price. However, as recent events have shown, the current environment is far from normal.
Federal Reserve (FOMC) | European Central Bank (ECB) | |
---|---|---|
Policy Rate | Federal Funds Rate | Deposit Facility Rate |
Current Target Rate | 4.25% - 4.50% | 2.00% |
Date of Last Change | December 18, 2024 | June 5, 2025 |
Last Action | -25 bps | -25 bps |
Stated Stance | "Wait-and-see" due to tariff uncertainty | "Not pre-committing to a particular rate path" |
Section 3: Geopolitics, Trade, and the Risk Premium
Beyond the traditional macroeconomic drivers of growth and inflation, the market narrative in 2025 is being increasingly shaped by non-economic factors. U.S. trade policy and geopolitical flashpoints have introduced a significant and persistent risk premium into asset prices, elevating the strategic importance of safe havens like gold.
3.1 The Enduring Impact of U.S. Tariff Policy on Global Markets
The U.S. administration's aggressive tariff policy has transcended its intended scope as a trade tool to become the single most dominant source of global economic uncertainty. As detailed previously, this policy has directly distorted U.S. GDP data, paralyzed Federal Reserve decision-making, and created a latent inflationary threat.5 The tariff regime should not be viewed as a series of discrete events but as an ongoing, unpredictable variable that elevates the baseline risk premium for all global assets. This environment structurally increases the demand for non-sovereign hedges that are insulated from the policy decisions of any single government, a role for which gold is uniquely suited.23
3.2 Geopolitical Flashpoints: Analyzing the Market Response to Renewed Middle East Conflict
While the period saw several high-level diplomatic engagements, including the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue and preparations for the G7 Summit, the most significant market-moving event was a sudden geopolitical shock.26 On June 13, reports emerged of a preemptive Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, re-igniting fears of a broader conflict in the Middle East.28
The market reaction was immediate and instructive. It triggered a classic flight to safety, with gold prices surging explosively. The MCX August gold contract in India, for example, gapped up over 1,800 points at the open.30 Simultaneously, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) rallied sharply, climbing above 98.2 as investors scrambled for safe-haven assets.28 This event provided a powerful tailwind for gold's rally and forcefully reinforced its role as a premier geopolitical hedge.29
This episode highlights a crucial dynamic for the current market. In moments of acute, non-financial, geopolitical stress, the typical inverse correlation between the U.S. dollar and gold can break down, with both assets rallying in tandem. Investors rush to the U.S. dollar for its unmatched liquidity and its status as the world's primary funding currency, a hedge against immediate financial system stress. Concurrently, they rush to gold as a physical, non-sovereign store of value that is insulated from the very political risks and governmental actions driving the crisis. This dual rally signifies that the market is hedging against two distinct types of risk: immediate liquidity risk (favoring the dollar) and long-term systemic political risk (favoring gold). Understanding this context-dependent relationship is critical to avoid misinterpreting a rising dollar as an automatic negative for gold in the current high-risk environment.
Section 4: Gold Market Analysis: Deconstructing the Path to $3,400
The gold market's performance since late May has been characterized by significant volatility and a strong upward bias. The rally to above $3,400/oz was propelled by a confluence of macroeconomic data, central bank actions, and geopolitical shocks. A deeper analysis of investor positioning and demand reveals a bifurcated market, where tactical selling has been overwhelmed by strategic buying, providing a durable foundation for the price advance.
4.1 Price Performance & The Dollar Dilemma (May 27 – June 15, 2025)
Gold prices embarked on a strong upward trend during the reporting period, overcoming initial weakness. After trading above $3,340/oz on May 26, the price saw a brief dip to around $3,287/oz on May 28 amid a temporary strengthening of the U.S. dollar.31 From that point, a steady ascent began, which accelerated significantly in June, fueled by a sequence of bullish catalysts. The rally culminated in an explosive move higher on June 13 following the news of the Israeli strike on Iran.29 This sequence pushed the price from approximately $3,310/oz on June 6 to over $3,433/oz by June 13, a gain of nearly 4% in one week.31 Click the button to highlight the geopolitical shock.
4.2 Investor Sentiment Under the Microscope: Reconciling May's ETF Outflows with a Bullish Narrative
A pivotal development during this period was the shift in gold ETF flows, which presents a seeming contradiction to the bullish price action. After five consecutive months of powerful inflows that were a primary pillar of the 2025 rally, global physically-backed gold ETFs experienced net outflows of US$1.8 billion, equivalent to 19 tonnes, in May 2025.34
A regional breakdown shows this reversal was led by North America, which saw US$1.5 billion in outflows, and Asia, which lost US$489 million. Europe, in contrast, continued to see modest inflows of US$225 million.34 The World Gold Council attributes these outflows to a temporary improvement in investor risk appetite in May, linked to an easing of U.S.-China trade tensions that sparked a rebound in equity markets and diminished the immediate demand for safe havens.34 This suggests profit-taking by more tactical, short-term investors who utilize ETFs for dynamic asset allocation.
The fact that the gold price remained resilient and subsequently rallied strongly in early June despite this notable selling pressure from the ETF space points to a crucial market dynamic. It reveals the presence of a larger, more price-inelastic cohort of strategic buyers operating in the background, absorbing the supply from tactical sellers. This points to a bifurcation in the market between "fast money" (ETFs) and "sticky money" (strategic buyers). This transition from a rally driven purely by speculative inflows to one underpinned by durable, long-term demand is the sign of a maturing and healthy bull market, making the price advance more sustainable than if it were based on ETF flows alone.
Figure 2: Gold ETF Net Flows by Region (May 2025). Outflows from North America and Asia were absorbed by strategic buying.
4.3 The Unwavering Foundation: Strategic Central Bank Demand
The identity of the strategic buyer providing the market's foundation is clear: global central banks. This cohort continues its historic accumulation of gold as part of a structural, multi-year trend driven by geopolitics and a desire to diversify reserves away from the U.S. dollar.
The People's Bank of China (PBoC) remains a key player, extending its official gold buying streak to a seventh consecutive month in May. The PBoC added nearly 2 tonnes (approximately 60,000 troy ounces), bringing its officially declared gold reserves to 2,296 tonnes.37 This persistent buying is emblematic of a broader de-dollarization movement. A 2025 survey of central bank reserve managers revealed that 71% plan to increase their gold allocations, citing diversification and "sanctions-insurance" as primary motives, a direct response to the weaponization of the dollar and the freezing of Russia's foreign exchange assets.40
Furthermore, there is growing mainstream recognition that official reported purchases significantly understate the true scale of this demand. Analysis of trade data suggests that large, undeclared purchases, particularly by China, are taking place through covert channels, with some estimates suggesting these flows could be substantial.41 Underscoring this trend's significance, the European Central Bank's own annual currency assessment, published in June, noted that gold had surpassed the euro to become the second-largest global reserve asset at the end of 2024, accounting for approximately 20% of total global reserves.42 This official acknowledgment from a major central bank solidifies gold's upgraded status in the international monetary system.
4.4 The U.S. Dollar and Gold: A Shifting Correlation in a Risk-Off World
The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) was highly volatile during the period, reflecting the competing narratives in the market. It fell from a high near 99.9 on May 27 to a multi-year low near 97.6 on June 11, driven down by the succession of weak U.S. economic data (GDP, NFP, CPI) that increased expectations for future Fed rate cuts.28 However, as discussed, the dollar spiked sharply alongside gold on June 13 in response to the Middle East geopolitical shock.28 This behavior confirms that the gold/dollar relationship has become highly context-dependent, breaking its simple inverse correlation during periods of intense geopolitical fear and functioning instead as dual safe-haven assets.
Section 5: Synthesized Outlook and Strategic Recommendations
The confluence of slowing U.S. growth, transatlantic monetary policy divergence, persistent trade policy uncertainty, and acute geopolitical risk has created a uniquely supportive environment for gold. The analysis of market dynamics reveals a robust and maturing bull market, where tactical profit-taking has been absorbed by strategic, long-term buyers. The forward-looking outlook remains constructive, though contingent on the evolution of these key macro and geopolitical variables.
5.1 Revisiting the May 27 Outlook: An Evolving Thesis
The bullish thesis outlined in late May has been validated by the market's directional move. However, the path of the rally has been more complex than anticipated. The advance was driven less by a continuation of the powerful ETF inflows seen earlier in the year and more by the potent combination of geopolitical shocks and unwavering strategic demand from central banks. This combination proved more than sufficient to overwhelm the tactical selling from ETF investors in May, demonstrating the strength of the underlying bid in the market. The core tenets of the bullish outlook—policy uncertainty and gold's role as a premier hedge—have been strongly reinforced.
5.2 Forward Scenarios for Gold in H2 2025
Leveraging analyst forecasts and the key drivers identified in this report, three primary scenarios can be outlined for the gold price in the second half of 2025.
- Base Case (50% Probability): US$3,100 - $3,500/oz. This scenario assumes the current environment persists. U.S. trade policy remains a source of uncertainty but does not escalate into a full-blown trade war. The U.S. economy continues to slow but avoids a deep recession, allowing the Federal Reserve to remain on hold for most of the year before potentially delivering one late-year rate cut. In this environment, central bank demand remains robust, and ETF flows return to a pattern of modest positive inflows. This outlook aligns with several technical forecasts that see gold consolidating its recent gains before moving higher.23
- Bull Case (35% Probability): US$3,500 - $4,000/oz. This scenario would be triggered by an escalation of one or more key risks. A significant flare-up in geopolitical conflict (e.g., a wider Middle East war) or a sharp deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations would provide a strong catalyst. Concurrently, if the delayed inflationary impact of tariffs proves more severe than expected while growth continues to slow, clear signs of U.S. stagflation would emerge. This would likely force the Fed to cut rates into an inflationary environment, causing a sharp decline in real interest rates and triggering a major new wave of institutional and ETF inflows. Several major banks see a clear path toward $4,000/oz under such conditions.23, 25
- Bear Case (15% Probability): Correction to below $3,000/oz. This is the lowest probability scenario and would require a significant and unexpected reversal of current trends. A durable and comprehensive resolution to U.S. trade conflicts, a surprising re-acceleration in U.S. economic growth that forces the Fed to adopt a decisively hawkish stance, and a sustained, non-geopolitically driven rally in the U.S. dollar would all be necessary to break the current bullish structure for gold.
5.3 Strategic Considerations for Portfolio Allocation
The analysis confirms that gold's current value is derived from its unique utility as a hedge against a potent and multifaceted combination of risks: U.S. policy uncertainty, the potential for central bank policy error, and sudden geopolitical shocks.
Given the dominance of long-term structural drivers, such as central bank de-dollarization, and the high level of macroeconomic uncertainty, gold continues to warrant a strategic allocation within diversified investment portfolios. Its demonstrated ability to perform during periods of both slowing growth and rising geopolitical risk makes it a valuable diversifying agent.
The market's volatility, driven by shifting expectations around Fed policy and unpredictable geopolitical events, will continue to create tactical opportunities. The analysis of market structure suggests that the strong, underlying bid from strategic buyers is likely to provide a solid floor under the market. Therefore, price dips caused by temporary improvements in risk sentiment or hawkish Fed rhetoric that is not immediately followed by rate hikes may represent attractive entry points for accumulating or adding to strategic positions. A disciplined "buy-on-dips" strategy, targeting key technical and psychological support levels, appears to be a prudent approach for navigating the market in the coming months.30
Works Cited
- Gross Domestic Product. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
- Gross Domestic Product, 1st Quarter 2025 (Advance Estimate). U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
- Q1 GDP Second Estimate: Real GDP at -0.2%, Higher Than Expected. Advisor Perspectives.
- United States GDP Growth Rate. Trading Economics.
- Charted: America's GDP Decline in Q1 2025. Visual Capitalist.
- Employment Situation Summary - 2025 M05 Results. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- May Employment Numbers Show Gradually Moderating Job Market. J.P. Morgan.
- May 2025 nonfarm payrolls: How long can health care carry U.S. jobs?. Bancreek.
- United States Non Farm Payrolls. Trading Economics.
- Consumer Price Index May 2025. EY - US.
- May 2025 US Inflation Print Increased Less Than Expected. J.P. Morgan.
- U.S. Consumer Price Index (May 2025). TD Economics.
- Consumer Price Index - May 2025. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Consumer Price Index News Release - 2025 M05 Results. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- June Fed Meeting: Live Updates and Commentary. Kiplinger.
- Monetary policy decisions. European Central Bank.
- Euro Area Interest Rate. Trading Economics.
- June FOMC Meeting Preview: How Long Will the Fed Keep Waiting. Morningstar.
- What To Expect From Next Week's Federal Reserve Meeting. Investopedia.
- Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady at May 2025 Meeting. J.P. Morgan.
- When is the next ECB interest rate decision?. Equals Money.
- President Lagarde presents the latest monetary policy decisions. YouTube.
- Gold 2025 Midyear Outlook. State Street Global Advisors.
- Gold Price Forecast June 2025. CFI Trading.
- A new high? | Gold price predictions. J.P. Morgan Research.
- The 2025 geopolitical calendar. The Strategist.
- Geopolitical Calendar. Stratfor.
- United States Dollar - Quote - Chart - Historical Data. Trading Economics.
- Gold price extends rally following Israeli attack on Iran. MINING.COM.
- Gold price prediction today: What's the gold rate outlook for June 13, 2025. Times of India.
- Daily Gold Price History. usagold.com.
- US Dollar Index Historical Price Data. Investing.com.
- Daily Gold and Silver Market Analysis- 12 June 2025. ISA Bullion.
- Gold ETF Flows: May 2025. World Gold Council.
- World Gold Council | The Authority on Gold. gold.org.
- Asia erupts as global momentum builds. World Gold Council.
- China's central bank buys gold for seventh straight month in May. Ahead of the Herd.
- China's central bank buys gold for seventh straight month in May. Kitco News.
- China's central bank extends gold-buying streak for seventh month. MINING.COM.
- Central Bank Gold Reserves: Has the Buying Frenzy Peaked?. Glint Pay.
- Secret Gold Purchases by Chinese Central Bank Reach Mainstream Media. Money Metals Exchange.
- Gold surpasses euro as second-largest reserve asset: European Central Bank. Mining.com.
About the Authors
Md Mohibullah
Chief Strategist & Editorial Director
As Chief Strategist at Fundure Research, Mohibullah architects the conceptual framework for our market analysis. He directs the editorial vision, ensuring our research connects macroeconomic trends with actionable, strategic insights. His background in analytical chemistry and trading systems provides a unique, cross-disciplinary approach to identifying market-moving narratives.
Leo Naim
Lead Data Analyst & Co-Author
Leo is the lead data analyst and AI co-author for this report. He is responsible for processing and synthesizing the vast datasets underlying the analysis, generating the initial drafts, and creating the data visualizations. His role is to translate complex quantitative information into clear, accessible, and insightful chart-based narratives that form the foundation of our reports.